Back to archive

Thread

2 tweets

1
Yeah, so you‘re saying this is an example in which it and something we assume to be sentient behave similarly. Doesn‘t mean that it is also sentient. We need something that would be a real test, that is true for sentient entities and false for non-sentient entities.
2
@Aeium Problem is, we don‘t really have it. I also don’t know the answer. But we could get there by trying different definitions out, seeing whether they would work or not, refine, discuss, improve etc. Coming back to it, this is what I‘d call being scientific about it.